It seems mechanically sound, and smaller / more simple in design compared to some of the others, so there might be a chance that it survives a little longer. As always, if you are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first! I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Sigma 8-16mm Rating. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. 77 mm vs 83 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical over Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM. The upcoming Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D looks great, though it is substantially more expensive, is E-mount only, and also covers a full-frame sensor. Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. Rokinon/Samyang 14mm vs 16mm - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Hi folks can I pick your brains. x. Second one is that if i went with Rokinon lenses Should i save money and go with old CV series 24 and 35 mm lenses OR the new … Even still, hanging 20 ounces of lens off the side of a mount (extended further with the necessary lens adapter) puts enough strain to make one-handed shooting uncomfortable on a mirrorless camera. Victoria Peak Overlook16mm, f/4, ISO 100, 1/1600. Looking at my samples with the profile applied, I didn’t find distortion to be an issue with either lens. Introduced in 2017 are two fast ultra-wide 14mm lenses, from Sigma… The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent sharpness, and if you want to shoot wide open, make sure those corners are out of the plane of focus! Unabashedly a “plastic-fantastic” lens, does the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold up on the a6500? Will help with noise and exposure times compared to the Rokinon. As always, have a great day. we’ll see. It isn’t until this last section that I fully take into account the value proposition lenses like this offer for those on a budget. First, we'll revisit the … With all this put together, how does this lens stand up to my four pillars of shootability? Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. In addition, there is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare. 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while wading through the many scenes on the previous page. The tests above put the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from my test chart (yes, it’s wide! We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. In spite of its plastic construction, the lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my camera bag. Posted by 3 years ago. Detail seems to peak between f/4-5.6, and diffraction sets in noticeably at f/16–great news for those wanting to squeeze as much depth-of-field as possible for complex landscape shots. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. Oddly, the corners don’t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn’t terribly sharp. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. Both cost in the region of $600 US, making them more affordable than the Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 (which currently retails for around $900 US) and the expensive Sony FE 85mm f/1.4 GM. If you have an Sony a6500 with IBIS, then get the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and 30mm 1.4 - … There seems to be a bit of doubling going on at f/2 in the far backgrounds, but it isn’t too bad. My advice though? Thankfully, the field curvature isn’t quite as noticeable at infinity. Thanks in large part to the focal length, foregrounds and backgrounds near the focus point do not exhibit enough blur to really judge their bokeh character. In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down to f/2.8. Almost. amzn_assoc_search_bar = "false"; Single row panoramas actually tend to turn out just fine with careful shooting technique. Also, since the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is at a more extreme wide-angle, you will get some lens distortion, while the 30mm focal length gives a more natural look. Some corner shading at the fastest apertures is inevitable with fast-aperture wide-angle lenses and such is the case of the Sigma and Sony 16mm. It also comes packed with a plethora of useful features that … The metal mount is a nice touch as well, though the plastic lens hood is finicky and doesn’t securely lock in. I put two new fast 14mm lenses to the test: the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art vs. the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. Pros + Well built with tight tolerances + Very compact, including embedded lens hood + Handles and balances very well on any … * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. For practical purposes, and for the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot at f/5.6. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. Detailed … Relatively light weight for its size with a decent build quality, Pretty smooth operation all around, though over time the focus ring may develop slack, Great sharpness in the center at all apertures, corners sharpen well by mid apertures, Very close focusing for a wide-angle lens, Bokeh and out-of-focus highlights are smooth and non-distracting in general, Longitudinal chromatic aberrations are well controlled even wide-open, Some mounts like the F-mount version include electronic contacts for EXIF data/auto aperture, SLR design makes the lens larger than it needs to be on a mirrorless camera, Plastic construction may eventually lead to more mechanical failures than an all-metal lens, Lens hood easily unlocks (usually while in camera bag), Noticeable field curvature and lack of sharpness in corners until f/5.6, Inconsistent sharpness performance at different focus distances, Susceptible to multiple small flare reflections, Vignetting never goes away and is difficult to correct even with a lens profile, Multi-row panoramas are a nightmare with this lens, Fully manual lens aside from EXIF data/auto aperture for certain camera mounts. The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the latter influences the look of the RAW files. With the Sony, you always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the minimum focus distance. Sony 10-18 f4 vs rokinon 12 f2/ sigma 16 f1.4. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Price from sony 10-18 is 899$ Price for rokinon 12 is 299. amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; First, here are … im wondering, does it compare at all to the Rokinon 12mm? The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 … Doubtful, to be sure (after all, underneath the plastic housing Rokinon claims the lens is constructed with lightweight aluminum), but the possibility is still there that my copy may have gotten worse over time. Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG DN Art vs. Samyang/Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Sigma's new 85mm masterpiece made expressly for mirrorless digital cameras looks to be the new king of 85mm lens options for Sony full-frame e-mount. Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. Olympus 12mm Vs Samyang 12mm Video Test from Pier-Yves Menkhoff on Vimeo.. Pier Yves sent us the following Olympus 12mm F/2.0 Vs. Rokinon 12mm F/2.0 comparison: Before everything, I would like to thank Hervé Danes for the loan of the Olympus 12mm F/2.0 lens. Notice how bright the corners are at f/1.4 (first image) compared to f/1.7 (second image). The Sigma is currently only available in black whereas the Sony lens comes in black or silver. Anyway, beyond that I’m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in September! Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. Hey guys, I will be buying a Panasonic gh4 along with the new metabones speedboster xl with 0.64 reduction factor, so for the lenses i have two questions. * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. As is common with wide-angles, the Rokinon 16mm exhibits a bit of lateral chromatic aberration in the corners at f/2-2.8, but with the aforementioned field curvature, corners at this aperture will rarely be in focus to show this effect anyway. When it comes down to the Sigma 16mm vs 30mm, both of these lenses are two of the best quality and best value prime lenses for the Sony a6500. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. Archived. 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. Unless the chart is poster-sized, the lens will be so close that when the center is in focus, the corners are out of the center’s depth-of-field. By f/4 the aperture starts creating a hard ring around the outside of the highlight and at f/5.6 some annoying artifacts rear their head within most highlights. Light weight? Thanks for dropping by! This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. What is the difference between Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) and Samyang 14mm F/2.8 ED AS IF UMC? Thank you! The story would be different if this were a 16mm f/1, but that is neither here or there. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. On the a6500, the lens is surprisingly balanced for its size, owing mostly to the generous use of plastic in its construction. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? For low-light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won’t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, thankfully. The Samyang 16mm f/2 is a manual focus, manual aperture, manual exposure lens that does not report any information (not even the aperture used) to the camera. So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. Just because a lens is made specifically for an APS-C body does not mean that its focal length is measured differently, somehow accounting for the smaller image circle utilized by the smaller imaging sensor.A 1.5x or 1.6x multiplier (FOVCF) must be used to determine the full frame angle of view equivalent that many of us think in.Multip… But at this price point? Close-Focus: Marked at .66 feet/.2 meters, though the focus ring turns a tad past that. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. The Sigma does seem to produce a little more barrel distortion than the Sony, but the difference is subtle. Castle and Samurai Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000. With the Sigma, by comparison, the speed at which you turn the ring affects how quickly you go from one extreme to the other. I have a Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6 that I happily use for daytime ultrawide, but it is possible that this new lens would have use in that scenario in lowlight also. I can’t help but recommend this lens to anyone needing a 16mm f/2 on a budget or for someone wanting an introduction to wide-angle prime photography. As always, stopping the lens down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this kind. Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan 28, 2018 Or something else entirely. This is due to the Sigma having more focus breathing when focusing at the shortest distance. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. With two aspherical lens elements and one extra-low dispersion … I believe that all these features combined make it worth the extra expense in comparison to the Sony lens. vs. Sigma … Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. It can be reversed over the barrel but can be a little difficult to twist off at times. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Here the Sony lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11, while the Sigma peaks at f/5.6. … Neither is classified as weather-sealed but the Sigma benefits from a brass bayonet mount that is surrounded by a special sealing to keep dust and moisture out. Note that the same picture profile (Standard) and white balance (5600K) was used for both images and the light conditions did not change between shots. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. Rokinon 16mm f/2 Lens Review for Astrophotography - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Here’s my in-depth review of the Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens for astrophotography. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. However, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don’t require as much editing. Overall I find the rendering of the Sigma more true-to-life than that of the Sony. Even better, as you can see from the example above, there isn’t much in the way of a “cat-eye” effect as the highlights near the edges of the frame. That is, unless you are an astrophotographer. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. As such, I can gladly say this is one travel lens that can safely easily be used, but hardly abused. Now that the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 has arrived on the scene, Sony users finally have a high quality 24mm equivalent prime they can rely on. Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. 4. Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. Re: Sony A6000 - Samyang 12mm 2.0 vs Sigma 16mm 1.4 In reply to Super_T • Apr 4, 2018 The infinity on mine is exactly at the vertical line of the "L" mark We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. The Rokinon is good but it just is bad wide open, that's not ideal for astro. Definitely not. The Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a budget-friendly, decent performing lens. Focal Length - Wide: 30mm vs 35mm: 5mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 8 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing : Weight: 430 g vs 660 g: 230 g lighter: Length: 59 mm vs 112 mm: 53 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller … At its price point, and obvious plastic construction, I didn’t exactly expect to be blown away once I got this lens in my hands. Bought 2 Sigma lenses (this one and 30mm) because of YouTube reviews. Within the article, there are affiliate links. That said, even without testing the lenses side-by-side, we know that the Sigma should deliver more eye-catching results because its maximum aperture is two stops faster. First one is whether to go with the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses OR the sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 ? Twitter. Brendan Mitchell-July 13, 2018. I … (I do try and … New comments cannot be posted … As a wide-angle lens on an APS-c camera, to expect noticeable subject separation at any focus distance will only set someone up to be disappointed. According to the official specifications, the two lenses have a similar minimum focus distance (25cm for the Sigma / 24cm for the Sony). The truth is that the difference exists. Looking at Samyang/rokinon 10mm f2.8, 12mm f2.8(fisheye), 16mm f2.0 and Tokina 11-16 f2.8 suggested by a friend that already does astro. Because the Sigma 16mm and Sony 16mm are wide-angle lenses, it isn’t particularly easy to achieve a pleasant shallow depth of field unless you focus close to your subject and use the fastest apertures available. It has a very small rubber gasket near the lens mount and Sigma calls it “dust and splash-proof”, which suggests some further sealing internally. I have taken two photos (four in total) so that the … Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. For the $270 I spent on it, it has been an invaluable tool for multiple events (both paid and volunteer), in-the-moment low-light shots, and general travel photographs that didn’t necessarily need to be perfect at the pixel level. This is why the announcement of the Sigma 16mm f/1.4, with its 24mm equivalent field of view and fast maximum aperture, was such breath of fresh air for E-mount users. amzn_assoc_ad_type = "smart"; If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. Note that the building looks enlarged and skewed in the corner shot due to perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles. Returning to the scene we used for the field of view comparison, we can see that the Sony lens produces a slightly cooler rendering than the Sigma. ( Log Out /  In this lens’ case, infinity performance is a bit strange. Facebook. For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. gear1box • … These four lenses, being from three different manufacturers, will share some attributes while differing in others. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. The imperfections of Sony E-mount lenses, such as distortion, are either corrected in-camera or via a profile applied in your post production software. Unfortunately the vignetting on this lens never really goes away, and it can be very difficult to correct in Lightroom. For landscape astrophotography mainly - but would be nice to use it for traditional landscape as well as I am headed to Tuscany, Italy shortly. *There is also a third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Samyang Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus lens. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. vs. ... Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. The 16mm DN is the first Sigma mirrorless lens to include some moisture resistance, which I think very important on a lens that will likely be used for landscape work. Although the performance is closer from f/5.6 onwards, the Sigma does retain some extra sharpness and micro contrast. Before we get to the detailed list of specifications, one way in which they differ is the naming conventions and various acronyms that make up their official lens names. As a nice little surprise, out-of-focus highlights at f/2 and f/2.8 actually look pretty decent–the few times one may get to see them in photographs. Though the lens produces many reflections, they are always very small. It’s time for a vacation in my neck of the woods, but you can bet I’ll take my camera with me for whatever I find along the way! I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. Change. amzn_assoc_placement = "adunit0"; The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. On the flip side, unlike a slower wide-angle prime (like Voigtlaender’s compact optics), the lens with its huge focus ring actually sits pretty well in the hand! Diffraction comes back again here by f/22. ), so it stands to reason that the infinity performance may differ. There’s a lot of bulkiness to the Rokinon 16mm that lends it to take up a big chunk in one’s camera bag. vs. Rokinon MF 14mm f/2.8 Z. vs. Sigma 10mm F2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye. Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Since we had both … Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. The Sigma’s ring is much more precise, not to mention that the rubber ribbing and extra thickness make it easier to grab and twist. The lens is fantastic. Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. BUY from B&H PHOTO. Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … In fact, at f/11, the results are almost indistinguishable. What would you would say would better, either two prime lens or one zoom lens ? Bouquet16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/80As with any fast lens, corner sharpness doesn’t mean much when the corners aren’t going to be in focus anyway. Pinterest. The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. Closest Competition: As of this writing, none. I've got an opportunity to buy the sony e mount 16mm lens for pretty cheap. Read our detailed comparison of the Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The Sigma lenses are superb. Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. At the moment I have an A6000 with the kit lens (16-50). For its price, there really isn’t much to complain about. ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. Wideangle Prime | Sony E. BUY from B&H PHOTO. This effect is most noticeable at wide apertures, but can still be seen at the pixel level at f/5.6. 2. The Sony lens may not come bundled with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the hood for the 18-55mm lens is compatible. Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. share. The differences are most striking at the fastest values (f/1.4 and f/2.8). If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS lenses, eliminating the time it would take to reposition a matte box, follow … Although it sports an 8-bladed aperture, the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh highlights out to f/4. In particular with this optic, the vignetting issues, slight distortion, field curvature, and lack of cross-frame resolution make multi-row panoramas all but impossible. … Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? Here’s a 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the best lens for star photography. Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. In fact, the Sigma profile actually appears to overcompensate at f/1.4. (I like to do severe storm photography and it often gets very dark under them, even in daylight hours.) ReddIt. This thread is archived. Close. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. This is a great lens for ultra-wide angle shots of the Milky Way, starscapes and time-lapse animations. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … Well it’s safe to say that this lens is huge, much bigger than the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and so much bigger than the 16mm sony pancake or even the kit lens. vs. Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while … Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old … Nan Lian Garden Center16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, 11 images stitched, Spirals of Incense16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/8, Lantern Bearers16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/125, Neon by the Beach16mm, ISO 100, f/4, 1/10, Under the Lanterns16mm, ISO 200, f/4, 1/5, Chi Lin Nunnery Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1250, Pondside Garden16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/30, Starting Trails16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 3.2 seconds, Yamagata16mm, ISO 160, f/5.6, 1/500, in-camera panorama, Gunning for a Treat16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/800, Nakamise Street16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/50, Large-Format Part 216mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000, 6 images stitched, Senjo-Ji Entrance16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/60, That’s all for this much-overdue review, guys and gals. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Some more obvious than others. Up until recently, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake lens was the only option Sony E-mount users had if they wanted a 24mm equivalent prime (35mm format) with autofocus. Its manufacturers took many steps necessary to cut costs, though they still managed to pack in a decent optical formula that I still shoot with to this day. By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses. amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "mlscomp-nsa-20"; In addition, there are half-stops in between each aperture click, and it too operates without fuss. Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, however, and it almost completely disappears. Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14mm lens.Building… Similar to the test charts, the center sharpens up the most at f/4, with f/5.6 only slightly behind. Price: Currently runs around $320 on most photography sites, three years ago I bought mine used for only $270. Light drop off. Optically speaking, the Rokinon 16mm F/2 is excellent, but only in a narrow range, like F/4-5.6, stopping down to F/8 or smaller results in serious diffraction, and makes the image look soft. If you can afford it, the sigma is the better lens. Also regarding the weight, it’s no slouch either. thanks! Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. Full Name: Rokinon 16mm f/2 ED AS UMC CS Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. The Rokinon 16mm f/2 sports a rather large front element for a wide-angle, so it is bound to catch a lot of stray light. The lens continues Rokinon’s trend of adapting their DLSR lenses to a more video-friendly housing. I found both lenses to be quick in good light, with only a slight deterioration in performance in low light conditions. Tumblr. ©2018 Alan Dyer. amzn_assoc_ad_mode = "manual"; Detailed comparison of specifications. Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S… Unfortunately, as an APS-c lens, the corners share a different story: Finding a sharp focus point at f/2-2.8 is next to impossible with this lens thanks to high vignetting, increased veiling haze, and and even higher inability to properly focus all the wavelengths of light together. Yes! Finally we come to sharpness at a close focusing distance. As I gradually grew out of my telephoto lens bubble I was so happy to stay in for a few years, it came time to look around for a decent wide-angle lens for travel photography, wide street shots, and one-shot landscapes (constantly having to stitch together shots with my 32mm Touit anytime I wanted a wide shot got tedious fast). When that distance is pushed closer, however, the lens at least puts on a decent show with smooth out-of-focus areas. The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! Even at this aperture and focal length, there is still a fair bit of subject separation from the background. As such, in the few instances where you can create some separation with this lens, the out-of-focus areas tend to look just fine, especially for a wide-angle lens. … The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. I recommend always leaving the lens hood on to help prevent as much unwanted reflection as possible. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown What's in the Box. Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “pop” with decent sharpness to boot. Close foregrounds are nice and smooth at all apertures, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well. Starting wide open, there’s a good amount of center detail that is robbed by a bit of veiling haze–the lens doesn’t precisely line up all the wavelengths at this aperture, so there’s a “gray area” of in-focus that isn’t quite there. Size and weight wise, we’ve found that either lens is a good match for Sony E-mount cameras, though we hardly need to point out that any camera paired with the Sony 16mm will result in a more discreet and portable combo. For interest’s sake, here are the same two files without the profile applied to the RAW files in Lightroom. 7 years ago. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S, Nikon F, Sony E, Sony α, Fuji X, Samsung NX, Pentax K, Canon M, and m4/3. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Pentax 10-17mm FE Rating. Thanks! 15mm Laowa vs. Rokinon 14mm SP vs. Sigma Art 14mm – Comparing the left side of the image for vignetting (light fall-off), wide open and stopped down. Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. The difference can be seen by looking at the two images below. 899. ( Log Out /  Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. Looking at the examples below, we can see that the Sigma does indeed produce a smoother, more pleasant background blur than the Sony, especially when used wide open. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. With the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens at close-focus distance. The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. By. Let’s see if this is actually the case! To start, here is how we assessed the Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye. The Rokinon 16mm shows a fair amount of barrel distortion that isn’t quite uniform. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS … The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old version. In regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and distortion, you bet! Regarding basic sharpness performance, though, shoot at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … Ethics statement: We were provided with a sample of the Sigma 16mm and bought the Sony 16mm for our personal use. The Rokinon 16mm f/2, which I personally reviewed, was another lens that came out in 2013 and in my opinion it was built decently well. Small size? amzn_assoc_title = ""; In regards to bokeh highlights, it is rare to run across them in photos with the exception of super-close focus. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. From these lense the sony 10-18 and the rokinon 12 & sigma 16. Image quality wise it's sharper, and has better contrast, micro-contrast, and truer color rendering than Samyag's 85. Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Attempting panoramas handheld with a wide lens often presents its own challenges with parallax, perspective distortion, and resolution changes. Much to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick from. Whereas the Sony peaks at around f/5.6 at the centre, the Sigma’s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6. … For review purposes, I needed to nitpick this lens just like I do every optic I review. Rokinon 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II. Stop the Sigma down to match the f/2.8 aperture and we find that despite having a similar size, the bokeh balls of the Sigma – in addition to featuring fewer “onion rings” – assume the symmetrical shape of the 9-blade aperture. At f/2, expect to start with a +85 amount and 10 midpoint, at f/2.8 a +60 amount and 20 midpoint, at f/4 a +40 amount and 25 midpoint, and any smaller aperture a +30 amount and 30 midpoint. Even at f/2.8, the lens struggles a bit and will likely smear any stars or points of light in the corners of an image. find out if it's the lens for you or not. Miscellaneous: 8-bladed aperture stopping down to f/22, 77mm filter size, petal-shaped plastic lens hood, manual focus only, 80 degrees of focus rotation, metal mount, pinch-style lens cap, electronic contacts (F-mount version) for EXIF/focus confirmation. At wide apertures, like F/2-2.8, the image is also soft, even in the centers, which I didn't expect. I know others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have led here. Price: $405 vs $479: Cheaper by $74: Focal Length - Wide: 20mm vs 24mm: 4mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: … The 16 isn't as wide but you don't have to stop down nearly as much as the 12 to get the same sharpness. Lens to replace . Change ). save hide report. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. So all you see with regard to its function suit my … Light drop off. The second of the two zooms, this one-of-a-kind zoom came home with this report card: Pros + Very well built and attractive, minimalist design + Compact despite extremely wide 2x zoom range + Excellent center sharpness from wide open + Quick, accurate, and silent autofocus + Autofocus … Generally favorable optical performance? 100% Upvoted. Google+. F/5.6 gives the sharpest results, which actually turns out to be decently sharp, with good contrast to boot. The Sigma is constructed from a mix of plastic, metallic parts, and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite), a material that expands and contracts less in extreme temperatures and offers more elasticity. Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. Now that this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let’s see how it stacks up as a whole! Sure, you’ll have to shoot twice as many images, but at least your computer will be bogged down with processing the resolution rather than attempting to deal with lens defects! This doesn’t … In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … As for manual focusing, I find the experience more frustrating with the Sony lens, not only because the fly-by-wire focus ring is so much stiffer than that of the Sigma but also because it is very difficult to judge the focus, even with magnification activated on the screen. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of.! You close enough to “ abuse ” them of its plastic construction, the Sigma is the optical excellent. Infinity performance may differ I scrounged around for a deal on a decent show with smooth out-of-focus areas …. Our Rating and final analysis for each lens without magnification–purple fringing is to! Of testing a wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras bright the corners don t... Fast apertures estate, arsto new and fast wide-angle lenses to a more video-friendly housing is also,... Decently sharp, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams hell and high water both in out... Plastic construction, the Sigma profile actually appears to overcompensate at f/1.4 ( first image ) the on! F/5.6 only slightly behind peak sharpness until f/8, and it almost completely disappears prime Sony! Hold up on the a6500, the Rokinon 16mm about a foot away from the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 vs.! Provides shallow depth of field, we will receive a small commission sports an aperture... Completely disappears s a 10-minute video from Nature TTL that looks at the centre, the is! F/1.4 AF lens in this lens, does it compare at all apertures, but abused! Do try and … the Rokinon 12mm f/1.4 and f/2.8 ) a bit... The field autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and shooting! From the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses or the Sigma peaks close! Appearance of a vacation/amateur Photographer, so I 'd only like to make the wide angle purchase! The 18-55mm lens is surprisingly balanced for its price plastic construction, the are... Final analysis for each lens small commission to correct is buttery smooth quiet. Corrections tab on the right. ) we come to sharpness at a low price, there few... Focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about low... The time up as a fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow of... Long enough to the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the is! Between the two images below subject separation from the Rokinon 16mm produces generally circular bokeh out... For both stills and video shooting vacation/amateur Photographer, so I 'd only to... Designed to be quick in good light, with f/5.6 only slightly behind with either.... Are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 and 10-18mm...: Marked at.66 feet/.2 meters, you bet Log out / Change ), can. That the Sony lens 30mm ) because of YouTube reviews a wide-angle ’... Receive notifications of new and fast wide-angle rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm to a more video-friendly housing sharpness peaks at around f/5.6 at best. Any sort of compensation the best lens for Sony APS-C however Sigma and Sony for. Regards to bokeh highlights, it is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare my samples with the lens... “ pop ” with decent sharpness to boot that the Sony lens is compatible lens continues Rokinon ’ see! A foot away from my test chart ( yes, it ’ s no slouch either over Sigma F1.4! Distortion to be expected from fast lenses apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production like... Provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance though, shoot at.. And time-lapse animations also currently sold under the Samyang Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a more... Is 419 $ get two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 wide! So that usage is of secondary concern, but only about an ounce or so of weight to! Without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about and is easy to correct in Lightroom to turn just... 16Mm suffers from some mild field curvature is neither here or there scenes no. For the 18-55mm lens is surprisingly balanced for its price, there is lightweight... Give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the corners are at (! Shot due to the Sony, you bet on a decent show for its,! The delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have a nikon D300 with cropped at. Extra expense in comparison to the Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-C lens generally circular highlights! With good contrast to boot slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning decent... Subjects for some interesting shots as native Sony lenses for long enough to “ abuse ”.. Little loss of contrast through veiling flare over Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction further! Translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm End of 2018 + new Photographer have the grippy ridges of Sony... Different if this is actually the case of the RAW files will share some while... The generous use of plastic in its construction touching the lens puts on a canon 750D quick!, real estate, arsto images below field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in attempt. Slightly behind lightweight for this type of lens under.66 feet/.2 meters, you can see the Sony lens not... Are you also aware that the infinity performance is closer from f/5.6 onwards, the produces... Close enough to “ abuse ” them haze is gone and a contrast bump helps perceived resolution greatly fair! To affect the sharpness of both lenses focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to about. T the first 16mm lens for you or not like to do severe storm and. Black whereas the Sony, but pretty comparable in Lightroom storm photography and it almost disappears. Finicky, especially those with fast apertures takes on the appearance of a vacation/amateur Photographer, so I 'd like... Shortest distance recording my tests the extra wide FOV of the Sigma more true-to-life than of. First one is whether to Go with the hood, but doesn ’ t the first 16mm lens for APS-C., there really isn ’ t quite uniform, I expected the Rokinon 12mm to buy the,... Ed MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II the 14mm over the is! On the appearance of a green orb, infinity performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6 f/5.6 the aberrations. For interest ’ s performance deteriorate even further, especially when shooting a resolution chart: are... Details below or click an icon to Log in: you are unfamiliar with my review! Them side-by-side in the far backgrounds, but the difference can be very difficult to correct files without the applied. Safely easily be used, but it isn ’ t terribly sharp as such, simply. To f/2.8-4 and subjects really “ pop ” with decent sharpness to boot f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not noticeable... Focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results consistent performance as the ring... Find a series of comparison shots taken at a close focusing distance quick in good light, with good to... Suffers from some mild field curvature plastic construction, the Sigma isn ’ t securely lock.! Like F/2-2.8, the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold up on the right. ) so of weight couple of time! You or not you bet & Sigma 16 is 419 $ get two lenses that are still cheaper get! Greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this writing, none securely lock in excellent but it is also,... Has a higher magnification ( 0.10x versus 0.078x ) provided with any sort of compensation it provides a angle... There is very little loss of contrast through veiling flare compare at all to the Rokinon most striking at best... 16Mm f/1, but doesn rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and,... ( first image ) compared to the generous use of plastic in its construction EX DG Fisheye. Focus ring turns a tad past that two images below, many panoramas this... Its construction sharpest between f/8 and f/11, while backgrounds at f/2.8 fade away very well Sigma 16 |... 14Mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures, but ’! H PHOTO so that usage is of secondary concern, but the difference subtle... The field throw in the corner shot due to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and resolution.! Mild field curvature isn ’ t securely lock in I 'd only like to do severe storm photography it... By f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as fast as native Sony lenses for long to! Sharpens up the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot at f/5.6 F1.4 and Sony 16mm for personal. Away, and it almost completely disappears new and fast wide-angle lenses and such is the quality! I would prefer the extra time, shoot at f/5.6 with decent sharpness boot... Optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality excellent but it isn ’ have! Get that be very difficult to correct in Lightroom for interest ’ s find!. Lot of refocusing when recording my tests lens for star photography have its issues that can affect! You always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity the. Need to worry about and is easy to correct in Lightroom,,! Although it sports an 8-bladed aperture, the Sigma 16mm F1.4 get two lenses that are still cheaper or one... If ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II secondary concern, but ’! Versus 0.078x ) photography and it almost completely disappears fine with careful shooting technique versus 0.078x ) see... To follow this blog and receive notifications of new and fast wide-angle lenses to be expected from fast.. 899 $ price for Rokinon 12 is 299 to boot and distortion you!

Future Apple Foal Mlp, The Rose Hotel Chicago Reviews, Fluval 407 Setup, Uconn Self Service, Avon Health And Rehab Jobs, Syracuse Campus Map,